Showing posts with label Brighton Area Buswatch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brighton Area Buswatch. Show all posts

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

The road ahead for bus lanes in Brighton and Hove

An issue raised at last week’s meeting of the Brighton and Hove Transport Partnership (declaration of interest: I sit on the Partnership as a pedestrian advocate) was the online petition launched by newly elected Labour Councillor Daniel Yates. The petition calls on Brighton & Hove City Council to reduce the hours of the Lewes Road bus lanes, opening them up to all traffic at certain times of day. Chair of the Partnership, Councillor Gill Mitchell, Labour’s new lead member for Transport, assured us that bus lanes will not be scrapped. She also said that the Valley Gardens scheme is on hold pending a review to ensure it delivers the right (economic) benefits and doesn’t worsen traffic congestion. 

Fair enough, but bus lanes are an essential element of the Valley Gardens scheme, and if they aren’t dedicated to buses (and taxis, and bikes, and possibly powered two wheelers), there’s no point in having them. The clue is in the name.

Taking up the theme, Brighton and Hove Buswatch has published a long piece in its latest newsletter. Since I can’t improve on it, I reproduce here (with permission) a few facts in support of bus lanes in Lewes Road, many of which apply to bus lanes in other parts of Brighton and Hove: 

Brighton and Hove has the highest bus use per head of population anywhere in England outside London. This is a fantastic achievement and good bus priority measures have made this possible.

Bus routes serving Lewes Road carry over 16 million bus journeys each year – that is over 50% more trips than in the entire city of Portsmouth which has a similar population to Brighton & Hove.

Over 60% local residents who responded supported the Lewes Road bus lanes during consultation

More people travel along Lewes Road by bus and bike than by car so it makes sense to give them priority.

One double deck bus can carry 90 passengers in the space of about three cars. Bendy buses can carry 120 or more, so they are very efficient users of road space.

Both Universities are expanding with the University of Sussex aiming to attract 1,000 extra students each year. If even a small proportion of these use cars traffic conditions could worsen significantly. Bus lanes enable students and staff to reach Universities easily.

Experience from London shows that restricting the hours of bus lanes creates confusion for motorists as most traffic regulations apply 24 hours.

Brighton is a 24 hour city – the N25 night bus runs up to every 10 minutes along Lewes Road, so the bus lanes are in use at all times.

Major events at the Amex Stadium involve Park and Ride buses which rely on bus lanes to speed them through traffic. 

The past few months have been very difficult for buses due to extremely disruptive roadworks which have often taken longer than planned. As a result bus use in the City has fallen for the first time in twenty years. We must reverse this trend and get back on track with improvements to keep Brighton and Hove moving. Bus lanes are vital to achieve this.

If bus lane times are restricted, services are likely to suffer. Here are some risks: 

Buses could become less frequent and less reliable

Fares may increase because fewer people travel to support the services

Evening services could be cut as these are often subsidised by profitable daytime buses

Congestion and pollution will get worse if more people use cars, so overall traffic levels will increase

Marginal bus services may become unviable, resulting in complete withdrawal unless the City Council funds a replacement service.

Taxi journeys will become slower and more expensive because taxis use bus lanes too 

Poor air quality has been mentioned as a reason for opening up bus lanes to reduce traffic queues. Clearly this will not be achieved if bus users transfer to cars and overall congestion increases. Bus companies are currently investing in low emission vehicles but money for new buses has to come from profits from bus services.

The City Council has been monitoring congestion since the first stage of the Lewes Road scheme was completed in 2013, but it was not possible to obtain accurate information while the Vogue Gyratory works were in progress last year. The initial monitoring report showed there was little change in journey times for general traffic along Lewes Road. We understand the spring 2015 monitoring report will be published soon. If it shows there has been increased rat running and congestion on other roads, this can be addressed in other ways. Restrictions can be imposed on through traffic movements and there is already a study into improving traffic flows at the Downs Hotel junction in Woodingdean.

The Buswatch piece goes on to make some excellent suggestions for getting people back on buses, which you can here.

And the MD of Brighton Buses, Martin Harris, has weighed in with a succinct blog post on the links between physical activity (see the previous post on this blog), public transport…and bus lanes.

Monday, 11 November 2013

“Free” parking isn’t free, and it’s a really bad idea for Brighton and Hove

Milton Friedman (a first citation on this blog, despite his Nobel Prize for Economics) published a book in 1975 with the title 'There's no such thing as a free lunch.' This refers to the economic theory that whatever goods and services are provided, they must be paid for by someone - you don't get something for nothing. The economics of the free lunch come to mind when it comes to the current Brighton brouhaha centred on free parking in the city.

This post is a shameless mash up of two news items, from Brighton Area Buswatch and Brighton & Hove Friends of the Earth, and concerns moves by local politicians to offer free parking at council car parks in the run-up to Christmas. This is to be discussed at a special meeting of Brighton & Hove City Council’s Policy and Resources at 4.30 tomorrow (Tuesday 12 November) at Hove Town Hall, with a vote on a motion by Conservative and Labour Councillors to allow free car parking at five Council run car parks on Saturday 7 December and on Sundays 8, 15 & 22 December.

image
If passed, the result will likely be more cars on the roads, leading to more traffic congestion, delays to bus services and more pollution and congestion for pedestrians and cyclists to endure. As Buswatch notes, buses are the lifeblood of Brighton and Hove, a huge success story, carrying four times more people than in most similar sized UK cities…..This achievement has been sustained through a partnership between bus companies and Councils. It is a policy enthusiastically supported by all political parties which has lasted for twenty years. Cycling has also increased substantially, mostly due to new cycle priority measures. A large number of people travel to Brighton & Hove by rail too. Brighton is the busiest station on the south coast. Trains are easily the quickest way to reach our city from London and many other places.

image

The overall result is that Brighton & Hove is officially the least car dependent city outside London. Many city authorities and politicians elsewhere are envious of this status and visit Brighton & Hove to see how it has been achieved.

So Brighton Buswatch questions the wisdom of encouraging more cars onto already congested roads with free parking offers, given that the past twenty years have shown that investing in good public transport is the most effective way to keep our city moving and build a thriving local economy.

image

As Brighton & Hove Friends of the Earth (BHFOE) point out, how can it be justified to spend Council tax-payers’ money subsidising greater car use in the run up to Christmas? It goes against the city’s long held sustainable transport policies which have developed under administrations of all political colours. These have served the city well to date and this can be demonstrated by the fact that we have shop vacancy rates well below the national average.

In the city some businesses have cried wolf over the impact of car parking charges and availability, and we’ve been subjected to unsubstantiated claims that these were killing the city. Yet Brighton and Hove has one of the better performing retail centres in the UK. In addition, studies have shown that traders can overestimate the number of shoppers arriving by car, and underestimate those who walk, cycle or use public transport.

BHFOE views the proposal as a knee-jerk response to short term political pressure, costing Council taxpayers money at a time of huge budgetary pressures: money which would be better invested in improving the public realm. This could be used to overhaul the bus shelters in London Road or fund other public realm improvements which would have a permanent economic benefit on the area.

As a recent report by Living Streets highlighted, making places better for walking can boost footfall and trading by up to 40% and in London town centres in 2011, walkers spent £147 more per month than those travelling by car.

The current proposal is socially divisive and sends out all the wrong messages, reinforcing the prejudice that car drivers are more important than those who walk, cycle and use public transport to do their shopping. Given that since 2004, spending by car drivers has fallen while spending by public transport users and walkers has increased, this proposal also seems economically flawed.

Given that nearly 40% of households do not have access to a car and many who do still prefer to walk, cycle or use public transport to get into town, the Council should be rewarding these residents while focussing on filling the empty seats on buses and trains. This would be a good way of encouraging greater use of public transport and bringing more people into the city centre, without the stresses of driving in the busy Christmas period and creating more congestion and pollution.

As BHFOE concludes, “The Council shouldn’t accept the assertion that free car parking is the best and only way of boosting local trade when the evidence is to the contrary. At a time of scarce resources we should invest in improvements that bring lasting economic benefit, not splashing out on short-term giveaways.”

It’s beyond laughable that motorists, normally so obsessed about the costs of everything, can be so blind to the actual economic costs and benefits around parking their cars. Did someone mention lunch?

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

Brighton & Hove has highest UK bus use outside London.

Thanks to Brighton Area Buswatch for this item, lifted from their October newsletter. In contrast to the rants of Unchain the Brighton Motorist, it includes facts and evidence about transport in Brighton and Hove.
“Official statistics from the Department for Transport confirm for the second year running that Brighton & Hove has the highest bus use per head of population in England (excluding London). During 2012/13, over 45 million journeys were made by people boarding buses in the Brighton & Hove City Council area. This is around 5% higher than the previous year.

image

By comparison there were 21 million bus users in East Sussex and 26 million in West Sussex. In Portsmouth and in Medway which are both urban areas with similar populations to Brighton & Hove, the figures were 10 million and 9 million respectively.

Nationally there was a decline in bus use of 2.5%. Even London, which has experienced strong growth in recent years (assisted by enormous Government subsidies), recorded a small decline. Once again this is a tribute to our local bus companies who have worked hard to grow the market against the odds and to the pro-public transport policies of Brighton & Hove City council.” (my emphasis).

And speaking of Unchain The Brighton Motorist, how much money has this cost so far? Eight full page adverts in the Argus, and counting….

Unchain ads at 5.11.13